Recently, Sh. SK Bhan, the well-known Kashmiri poet cum satirist shared with me his poem titled ‘Masum Bacha Sinz Dastan’ - the lament of a child who is the victim of a broken home; his parents appear to be fighting for divorce and the child is forced to live in a hostel. The poem underscores the frustration and helplessness of an innocent child as an unwitting victim of circumstances, not of his own making. Parents appear to have been advised by the legal authorities to stay together ‘for sake of the child’, creating misery for the parents as well as the child! The child blames the ego and temperament clashes between his parents for its broken home.
The poem and its subject set me thinking about several episodes of broken homes and breakdown in marriages that I have seen in last five years within my own small social circle. I was able to list up as many as 12 cases where marriages had broken down within five years of solemnization; in most cases the separation was acrimonious, including filing of cross- FIRs and multiple cases by both parties involved. One particular relative, a retired army officer, had to seek ‘anticipatory bail’ to avoid getting arrested, even though the couple was living in a different city, away from both sets of parents! Separation stories, in cases involving kids, were messier; battle for custody of kids can be a long drawn and heart wrenching process.
So, what is happening on the marriage front in our society? We have growing instances of youngsters not being too keen on marriage or, marrying quite late in life. Career growth has become the pivotal parameter, both for men and women! Is the institution of marriage itself under threat of becoming redundant? As a society, in our scriptures and folklore, we were told that ‘marriages are a forever commitment’ and the bonding is for ‘7 janam’! So why are things coming unstuck so quickly? What has changed in our social set up in the last 25-35 years that we are seeing a higher frequency of marriage failures and broken homes. To get a broader view, I spoke to half a dozen female relatives who lead active social lives in Jammu, Bangalore and Delhi NCR, well established KP strongholds, and they too confirmed the unfortunate trend. There are three major victims of this unfortunate trend:
The subject is well beyond the scope of a limited 4-5 page write up. I have attempted to express my understanding of only the Point No 1. Much more needs to be written and theorized about all the three points, each one of which is worthy of filling up the pages of a thesis or a book.
Traditional Concept of Division of Labor -Provider-Protector vs Homemaker:
Traditionally, across civilizations, we find an almost a similar concept of the male partner, as protector, looking after physical security of the family besides being the provider of food (soldier, farmer, trader, artisan, traveller etc). Women, on the other hand, were more homebound, they cooked, looked after the home, hearth and progeny (including domestic animals). Women, of course were always contributing to farm income by performing several direct/ indirect chores. This model of division of labor continued for centuries. The challenge came when women started moving out of homes as part of industrial workforce or businesses. Today, with women constituting a healthy proportion of workforce in the organized as well as unorganized sector of economy, a new paradigm has set in. A woman has to go thru the same rigmarole as a man at workplace. She too comes home tired but is expected to get up to prepare food or to attend to various household chores while the husband can take things easy. This imbalance between roles and responsibilities gives rise to tectonic fault lines of frustration which may impact mental health, result in unhappy, unfulfilled marriage. Unresolved, these tensions can even lead to a breakdown of marriage and ultimately, divorce.
Today stands on the shoulders of Yesterday: Background
Analyzing situations is a human tendency, particularly when you have over a dozen human case studies before you! A broken home or concept of living separately from one’s spouse is as old as the Ramayana itself. In Kashmir, we used to have, in absence of a more appropriate word, women who can best be described as ‘deserted’ wives (the term used in Kashmiri was ‘traevmutch’). The ‘deserted’ ladies would spend their remaining lives with their parents/ brothers’ families. A relative of my wife was ‘deserted’ by her husband and left to fend off for herself (with her two kids) in early 1960s. Such cases were relatively few. At least two of my cousins had unhappy marriages and spent miserable years in an on-off relationship. Concept of a woman ‘deserting’ or leaving her husband was virtually unheard of. Society frowned at men who deserted their wives; ‘parental’ or societal displeasure used to be a big restrictive factor as it was thought to have a negative impact on wedding prospects of siblings. So, even while a husband and wife would fight like two game cocks, it used to happen within the four walls of home! Physical assault and manhandling were known to occur, though rarely. Women would face abuse and maltreatment from their ‘in-laws’; in Kashmir, we have the classic examples of Lal Dyed (14th century) and Mata Roop Bhawani (17th century CE) whose respective mothers-in-law made their lives miserable till they turned towards spirituality. ‘Child-marriages’ in KP society started mostly during Pathan rule (18th century) but by 1960s, mostly, girls would get married by 18-21 years of age – by that time they would have graduated from college. By 1970s, mostly, the marriage age level for girls rose to 22-26 yrs and by 1980s, the ‘acceptable’ norm became 26-28 as girls started going in for higher education or technical education. For boys too, as soon as a boy got a job, parents would be in a hurry to marry him off! Parents would still prefer that today, but now, they adhere to the boys’ wishes of late (28 to early thirties) marriages and, till the boy feels financially settled!
Kashmiri Pandits have traditionally been an educated but socially conservative society. The advent of Islamic rule in 14th century and the religious persecution suffered by our ancestors at the hands of zealot kings, particularly under the infamous Afghan rule (18th century) definitely scarred our psyche and impacted our social practices. The scars of the psyche stay on for generations! Even when Kashmiri Pandits migrated to the plains of Lahore, Delhi and beyond, in 17-18th century, they continued to retain a ‘close circuit’ Kashmiri connection amongst themselves for marriages. As Vinati Sukhdev, London based scion of an ‘old Kashmiri’ family wrote in the South Asia Monitor recently,” It was always ‘Kashmiri Pandit’ in my family and I am sure in others too. My parents' strictures were clear - contact with non-Kashmiris was on a need-to basis. They were friends, never relatives. We met them at work or in educational institutions. And we never (God forbid) married them. Right up to my generation, both my sister and I married Purana Kashmiris; people like us”.
I feel that 1970s marked a watershed change in Kashmiri society with women taking up employment outside homes becoming the norm. This naturally entailed several ‘adjustments’ within the families but MILs were happy to welcome ‘earning’ DILs, even if it meant extra burden for them. In fact, the marriage market got considerably ‘affected’ by the job related pecking order (of the ‘bride to be’ -Central Govt vs State Govt job vs Private job in that order). Financial prosperity also brought about ‘relocation’ to newly developing colonies from the old city and, to the ultimate nuclearization of families. Financial independence positively impacted the confidence level and assertiveness of women in our social decision making.
The current stress fractures that are visible on the marriage edifice of estranged couples can be the result of multiple factors, not all interdependent. Yet, the stability and sanctity of marriage is under stress!
Factors that can be responsible:
What can be done to minimize these cracks?
Accepting Rejection: In today’s time and social circumstances, it is possible that two well meaning adults are not temperamentally suited to living together. So, if they choose to move on in life, it can mean two lives liberated from forceful living together in a relationship that has lost its meaning. Divorce needs to get better acceptance though it must be the last choice, particularly if children are involved. Recently, I met a US based doctor who has walked out of his marriage after 4 decades of ‘living in misery’. His mother had selected the girl in 1977 and he carried along, in an unhappy marriage, so as not to hurt his mother!
Unfortunately, our legal system only adds to the mess. Divorce process is inhumanly tedious, even if both partners are mutually reconciled. If either partner refuses to play ball, then, God bless! A young colleague got his divorce after 9 years of delay because his wife’s council used the infamous ’tareek-pe tareek’ gambit– wife would avoid coming to the court on designated dates, causing delays. In another case, a doctor refused to let go of her husband out of vengeance, having vowed to ‘spoil his life’ without realizing that she was making a mess of her own life too. Legal eagles are always ready to play along (for a fee, of course) in prolonging the misery by teaching their clients new tricks and cheating the spirit, if not the letter of law.
Having said that, each parent owes a debt towards society – of preparing and training the younger generation in our cultural values and, in becoming decent, responsible citizens. This training has to start right from childhood and needs to be for both boys and girls without distinction. If we fail our children now, it is futile to expect them to live up to our ‘socio-cultural’ norms, values, morals and behaviour tomorrow! Our children currently are finding partners all over the country – in a recent community event in Edmonton, Canada, I met young KP girls with grooms from Kerala, Bihar, Bengal and Karnataka and the like. My own DIL is of Oriya stock, born in AP, educated in Tamil Nadu and working in Telangana. So, the stress of mixed cultural existence puts additional burden on our children. Marriage, by and large, has retained its sanctity in our Sanatan Sanskriti. As parents and family members, we just might have to contribute a bit more to make marriage a joyous experience that it is!